100%

Module 6 - Safety Management

Day 19: Hazard Control, the Focus Four, and Program Elements

10% of the exam - about 2 hours - 14 practice questions

0:00 / --:--

Reading

The Hierarchy of Controls

This framework is tested and is the correct answer structure for almost any "how should this hazard be addressed" question. From most to least effective:

Elimination removes the hazard entirely. Redesigning to avoid the work at height eliminates the fall hazard.

Substitution replaces the hazard with something less dangerous, such as a water-based coating for a solvent-based one.

Engineering controls isolate people from the hazard through physical means: guardrails, machine guarding, local exhaust ventilation, wet methods for silica.

Administrative controls change how people work: rotation, scheduling noisy work when fewer workers are present, training, permits, procedures.

Personal protective equipment is last because it protects only the individual wearing it, only if worn correctly, and it fails without warning.

The exam's point is that PPE is the least effective control and is never the first answer when a higher control is feasible. A scenario offering "require respirators" against "use wet cutting methods" wants the engineering control.

Job Hazard Analysis

A JHA, also called an activity hazard analysis, breaks a task into steps, identifies the hazards in each step, and specifies controls for each hazard. It is performed before the work starts, by the people who will do the work where possible, and it is revisited when conditions change. High-hazard activities commonly require a written, reviewed JHA before work is permitted to begin: excavation, steel erection, crane picks, confined space entry, energized electrical work, demolition.

The Focus Four

OSHA identifies four hazard categories responsible for the large majority of construction fatalities. Know them and the core protections.

Falls are the leading cause of construction death. The construction fall protection trigger height is generally 6 feet for most construction work, with different triggers in specific applications such as steel erection and scaffolds. Protection may be guardrails, safety nets, or personal fall arrest. A personal fall arrest system requires an anchorage capable of supporting 5,000 pounds per attached worker or designed with a safety factor of at least two under the supervision of a qualified person, a full-body harness, and a connector arranged so that free fall does not exceed 6 feet nor allow contact with a lower level. Body belts are prohibited for fall arrest. Scaffolds generally require fall protection above 10 feet. Ladders, holes, and leading edges each have specific requirements.

Struck-by hazards include vehicles and equipment, falling objects, and flying debris. Controls include high-visibility apparel, internal traffic control plans, spotters, hard hats, toe boards and debris nets, and exclusion zones under overhead work and around crane swing radii.

Caught-in or between hazards include trench collapse, equipment pinch points, and unguarded machinery. Excavation is the dominant risk. Protective systems are required at 5 feet of depth unless the excavation is entirely in stable rock (a shallower cut needs one too when a competent person sees signs of possible cave-in), and any excavation deeper than 20 feet requires a system designed by a registered professional engineer. Options are sloping, benching, shoring, or shielding with a trench box. Spoil piles must be set back at least 2 feet from the edge. A competent person must inspect the excavation daily, before each shift, and after any rain or change in conditions, with authority to remove workers. Excavations 4 feet or deeper require a means of egress within 25 feet of lateral travel.

Electrocution hazards include contact with overhead and buried lines, unguarded energized parts, and damaged equipment. Controls include lockout-tagout, ground fault circuit interrupters on construction sites, assured equipment grounding programs, minimum approach distances from energized lines, and utility locating before excavation.

Competent Person and Qualified Person

These are defined terms and the exam distinguishes them. A competent person is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards and has authorization to take prompt corrective measures. The authority is the essential half. A qualified person possesses a recognized degree, certificate, or professional standing, or extensive knowledge and experience, demonstrating the ability to resolve problems related to the work. Competent persons are required for excavations, scaffolds, fall protection, and others. Qualified persons design fall arrest systems and perform engineering determinations.

Program Elements

A credible site safety program includes management commitment with visible enforcement, employee involvement, hazard identification and assessment through JHAs and inspections, hazard prevention and control, training including new-hire orientation and task-specific training, incident investigation, emergency response planning, substance abuse policy, and program evaluation. The CM's review of a contractor's program checks for these elements and, more importantly, for evidence that they operate.

A recognized framework for these elements groups them as: management leadership, worker participation, hazard identification and assessment, hazard prevention and control, education and training, program evaluation and improvement, and, on sites with multiple employers, coordination and communication among them. Worker participation deserves emphasis on the exam: workers and their representatives are involved in setting goals, identifying and reporting hazards, and investigating incidents, and they have a real means to raise concerns without fear of retaliation. A program that only flows information downward, from management to crews, with no channel back up, is missing this element regardless of how thorough its written procedures are.

Inverted pyramid of the five hazard control levels from most to least effective From most effective to least: elimination removes the hazard, substitution replaces it with something less dangerous, engineering controls isolate people from the hazard, administrative controls change how people work, and personal protective equipment protects only the individual wearing it. PPE is the least effective and never the first answer when a higher control is feasible. ELIMINATION Physically remove the hazard SUBSTITUTION Replace it with something less dangerous ENGINEERING CONTROLS Isolate people from the hazard ADMINISTRATIVE Change how people work PPE last resort most effective least effective Controls the hazard itself Controls only the person's exposure
Work this from the top down. When a question offers respirators against wet cutting methods, the engineering control is the answer. PPE protects only the individual wearing it, only if worn correctly, and it fails without warning.
Hierarchy of Controls
Four cross-sections showing sloping, benching, shoring and shielding in an excavation Four methods of protecting workers in an excavation. Sloping cuts the walls back to a safe angle. Benching cuts them in steps. Shoring braces the walls with supports. Shielding places a trench box around the worker. Protective systems are required at five feet of depth unless the excavation is entirely in stable rock, and any excavation deeper than twenty feet requires a system designed by a registered professional engineer. Sloping Walls cut back to a safe angle by soil type Benching Walls cut in steps; not for Type C soil Shoring Walls braced against movement Shielding Trench box protects the worker, not the wall Required at 5 ft depth unless entirely in stable rock · over 20 ft requires RPE designSpoil set back 2 ft · egress within 25 ft of lateral travel at 4 ft depth
Shielding is the one people misread. A trench box does not prevent the wall from collapsing; it protects the worker inside it when the wall does. That distinction shows up in exam wording.
Excavation Protective Systems

Practice Questions

1. In the hierarchy of controls, PPE is:

  1. An engineering control
  2. The last and least effective control
  3. The first choice
  4. Equivalent to elimination

2. Wet cutting to control silica rather than requiring respirators is an example of:

  1. Administrative control
  2. Engineering control
  3. PPE
  4. Substitution

3. The general construction fall protection trigger height is:

  1. 10 feet
  2. 6 feet
  3. 4 feet
  4. 15 feet

4. Excavation protective systems are generally required at a depth of:

  1. 4 feet
  2. 6 feet
  3. 5 feet
  4. 10 feet

5. An excavation 22 feet deep requires a protective system:

  1. Designed by a registered professional engineer
  2. Only if soil is Type C
  3. Selected by the competent person from tabulated data
  4. Not required at that depth

6. A competent person is distinguished by:

  1. OSHA certification
  2. Ten years of experience
  3. The authority to take prompt corrective measures
  4. A professional degree

7. A personal fall arrest anchorage must support:

  1. 500 pounds
  2. The worker's body weight
  3. 1,000 pounds per attached worker, or a design with a safety factor of at least one, approved by a competent person
  4. 5,000 pounds per attached worker, or a design with a safety factor of at least two under a qualified person

8. Spoil piles adjacent to an excavation must be set back at least:

  1. 6 inches
  2. 2 feet
  3. 5 feet
  4. 10 feet

9. Excavation inspections by the competent person are required:

  1. Daily, before each shift, and after rain or changed conditions
  2. Once at the start of the job, and again only if the excavation is deeper than 20 feet
  3. Weekly
  4. Monthly

10. Body belts for fall arrest are:

  1. Prohibited
  2. Permitted
  3. Required above 6 feet
  4. Required on scaffolds

11. A safety program in which management issues procedures but workers have no real channel to raise hazard concerns without fear of retaliation is missing:

  1. Education and training
  2. Hazard prevention and control
  3. Worker participation
  4. Program evaluation

12. A crane pick, confined space entry, and demolition all commonly require, before work begins:

  1. A punch list
  2. A change order approved by the owner before any crane is mobilized
  3. A completed and reviewed JHA
  4. An EMR below 1.0

13. Rotating crews to limit individual exposure to a hazard rather than removing the hazard itself is an example of:

  1. Elimination
  2. Substitution
  3. Engineering control
  4. Administrative control

14. Assured equipment grounding programs and ground fault circuit interrupters are primarily controls for:

  1. Falls
  2. Struck-by hazards
  3. Caught-in or between hazards
  4. Electrocution

Micro-Assignment

Write a job hazard analysis for one high-hazard activity you have actually supervised or observed. Break it into at least six steps. For each step, list the hazards and specify the control, and label each control by its level in the hierarchy. Then count how many of your controls are PPE. If more than a third are, revisit whether a higher control is feasible for those steps.

Glossary

Hierarchy of Controls
Elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative, PPE, in descending effectiveness.
JHA
Job hazard analysis; task broken into steps with hazards and controls identified.
Focus Four
Falls, struck-by, caught-in or between, electrocution.
Competent Person
Able to identify hazards and authorized to take prompt corrective action.
Qualified Person
Recognized degree, certificate, or standing, able to resolve problems related to the work.
LOTO
Lockout-tagout; isolation of energy sources during service.
Worker Participation
Core program element in which workers help set goals, report hazards, and investigate incidents without fear of retaliation.
Management Commitment
Visible, resourced organizational commitment to safety as a core value, foundational to a credible safety program.

Progress

Previous: Day 18 Next: Day 20