About 4.1% of the exam content - about 90 minutes - 14 practice questions
0:00 / --:--
Reading
Resources are people and things. PMI splits them deliberately: team resources are the humans,
and physical resources are the materials, equipment, facilities, and supplies. Both need
planning, acquiring, controlling, and releasing, but they are managed with different tools and different
instincts. You motivate a team; you do not motivate a compressor. You expedite lumber; you do not expedite a
carpenter. On a GCHS rehab both fail in the same week if nobody planned them together.
Resource leveling shifts activities to fit a fixed crew size, resolving the week-3 over-allocation but extending the schedule by a week.
The resource management plan and the RBS
The resource management plan is a subsidiary plan covering: how resources will be identified
and quantified, how team members will be acquired, roles and responsibilities, project organization charts,
training needs, team development approach, recognition, and how resources will be controlled and released. For
physical resources it also covers procurement coordination, inventory, and logistics.
The resource breakdown structure (RBS) is a hierarchical list of resources by category and
type: labor by trade, equipment, materials, supplies. Do not confuse it with the WBS (deliverable-oriented), the
OBS (organizational units), or the RBS that stands for risk breakdown structure. Context tells you which RBS is
meant; on the exam, read carefully.
Two documents track availability and specifications. Resource calendars identify when each
resource is available: a subcontractor's committed weeks, a lift rental window, a crew member's approved leave.
Resource requirements state what each work package needs. Together they drive the schedule: an
activity cannot be scheduled into a window where its resource is unavailable, and pretending otherwise is how
schedules become fiction.
Resource calendars show availability windows; resource requirements show what each work package needs
Resources are formally released when no longer needed: an actual project management responsibility, not an afterthought
Assigning responsibility: RACI and the RAM
A responsibility assignment matrix (RAM) maps work to people. The most common form is a
RACI chart. The rule people forget: there is exactly one Accountable per row. Multiple
Responsible parties are fine; multiple Accountable parties mean nobody is accountable.
Letter
Meaning
Rule
GCHS example: permit submittal
R: Responsible
Does the work
One or more per task
Project coordinator assembles and files the package
A: Accountable
Owns the outcome, approves
Exactly one per task
Construction manager
C: Consulted
Two-way input before the decision
As needed
Design consultant, accessibility specialist
I: Informed
One-way notification after
As needed
Homeowner, grant officer
Estimating and acquiring resources
Estimate activity resources before you can estimate durations: the number of crew members determines how long
framing takes. Techniques include analogous estimating (this rehab resembles last year's, so
similar crew), parametric estimating (square footage times a labor-hour rate),
bottom-up estimating (most accurate, most effort: estimate each work package and roll up), and
expert judgment. AI-assisted estimating can accelerate the parametric approach by mining
historical job data, but the output still requires validation against experience and site conditions.
Acquisition means securing what you planned. Team members come from pre-assignment (named in
the charter), internal negotiation with functional managers, or external acquisition: hiring or
contracting. Virtual teams extend reach but need deliberate communication practices.
Multicriteria decision analysis helps select candidates against weighted criteria such as
availability, cost, experience, and skill.
A note on authority: in a functional organization the PM has little authority and must
negotiate for everyone; in a projectized one the PM has full authority; matrix
organizations sit between, weak to strong. If a scenario says a functional manager pulled your resource, the
answer is usually to negotiate with that manager directly first, not to escalate, and not to absorb the loss
silently.
Structure
PM authority
Resource availability to PM
Typical implication
Functional
Little or none
Little; functional manager controls
PM negotiates constantly; may be a coordinator
Weak matrix
Limited
Limited
PM acts as expediter or coordinator
Balanced matrix
Low to moderate
Low to moderate
Shared authority; conflict over priorities is common
Strong matrix
Moderate to high
Moderate to high
Full-time PM with real staffing influence
Projectized
High to almost total
High to almost total
Team reports to PM; release planning matters at closure
Optimizing resources in the schedule
Two techniques you must distinguish:
Resource leveling: adjusts start and finish dates so resource demand does not exceed
supply. It respects resource limits and often extends the critical path. Use it when a resource is
over-allocated or available only in a limited window.
Resource smoothing: adjusts activities only within their available float, so the critical
path and the completion date are not changed. It cannot always fully resolve over-allocation.
Related terms: crashing adds resources to shorten duration and typically increases cost;
fast tracking overlaps activities that were sequential and increases risk and rework. Neither is
a resource optimization technique: they are schedule compression techniques, and confusing the two families is a
reliable exam trap.
Managing physical resources
Physical resource management is inventory, logistics, and waste control. For GCHS that is very real: material
delivered too early to a Gulf Coast jobsite in July sits in humidity and heat; material delivered late idles a
crew that costs money every hour. Practices worth naming: just-in-time delivery to reduce storage and damage;
secure staging to reduce theft; lead-time tracking for long-lead items such as custom-sized doors or ADA fixtures;
and waste diversion planning, which is both a sustainability commitment and often a funder
requirement.
Control resources means comparing planned versus actual utilization and taking corrective action. Techniques
include alternatives analysis, cost-benefit analysis, performance reviews, trend analysis, and negotiation. When
a physical resource shortfall appears, the PM investigates the cause before reacting: a late delivery caused by a
supplier's capacity problem needs a different response than one caused by our own late purchase order.
Team resources are managed differently
People problems are solved by engaging people. If a crew member is underperforming, the PM's first move is a
direct, private conversation to understand the cause, not reassignment, not a note to HR, not escalation to a
functional manager. Team development follows the Tuckman stages (forming, storming, norming, performing,
adjourning), and a team in storming needs coaching and conflict facilitation, not replacement. Collocation and
team-building improve cohesion; a team charter establishes working agreements and is created
by the team, not handed down.
Releasing resources and closing out
When a phase or project ends, resources are formally released: subcontractors demobilized, equipment rentals
returned, surplus material inventoried or returned for credit, and team members released back to their functional
homes with performance feedback provided. On adaptive projects with long-lived stable teams, the team persists
across projects, so release planning looks different, but the material and equipment side still applies. Failing
to release resources burns budget on rentals nobody is using and damages your relationship with functional
managers waiting on their staff.
Common trap
A key crew member is pulled by a functional manager for a higher-priority job, threatening your schedule. The
trap answers are "escalate to the sponsor immediately" and "adjust the schedule and say nothing." The PMI
pattern is: understand the situation, negotiate directly with the functional manager for alternatives (a replacement, partial availability, a shifted window), and if that genuinely fails, then escalate with the
documented impact. Escalation is a real tool, but it comes after direct engagement, not instead of it.
Practice Questions
1. In a RACI chart, how many parties should be Accountable for a given task?
Exactly one
At least two for redundancy
None: accountability is shared
As many as are involved
Answer: a. Exactly one party is Accountable per task; multiple Responsible parties are fine, but shared accountability means no accountability. This single-A rule is a commonly tested point about RACI.
2. Which resource optimization technique adjusts activities only within their available float, leaving the project end date unchanged?
Resource smoothing
Crashing
Fast tracking
Resource leveling
Answer: a. Smoothing works within float and does not change the critical path or completion date, though it may not fully resolve over-allocation. Leveling respects resource limits and frequently extends the critical path.
3. A subcontractor is over-allocated across three activities and the project cannot obtain additional crews. Which technique applies?
Resource smoothing
Resource leveling
Fast tracking
Scope reduction
Answer: b. When demand exceeds supply and no more resource is available, leveling shifts dates to fit the constraint, often lengthening the schedule. Smoothing only works if enough float exists to absorb the conflict, which is not the case here.
4. Which of the following is a physical resource rather than a team resource?
A framing carpenter
A project coordinator
A scissor lift rental
A design consultant
Answer: c. Physical resources are materials, equipment, facilities and supplies: the lift rental is equipment. The other three are people and therefore team resources, managed with entirely different techniques.
5. The resource breakdown structure (RBS) is BEST described as:
A list of identified project risks
A hierarchy of project deliverables
A hierarchical list of resources by category and type
A chart of reporting relationships among project team members
Answer: c. The resource breakdown structure organizes resources by category and type. Deliverables belong to the WBS, reporting relationships to the OBS, and risks to the risk breakdown structure, which unfortunately shares the RBS abbreviation.
6. A functional manager reassigns a key crew member to another project mid-execution. What should the PM do FIRST?
Negotiate directly with the functional manager for alternatives
Adjust the schedule silently to absorb the loss and report only the final variance
File a formal complaint with the PMO
Escalate to the sponsor immediately
Answer: a. Direct negotiation with the person who controls the resource is the PMI-preferred first move, and it often produces a workable alternative. Escalation is a legitimate later step once direct engagement fails, and silently absorbing the impact hides a real schedule risk.
7. Who creates the team charter?
The project manager, alone, before the team is formed
The team itself, collaboratively
The sponsor
The PMO
Answer: b. A team charter establishes working agreements and is created by the team, not handed down by the PM, sponsor, or PMO. A charter imposed from outside rarely produces the buy-in it is meant to create.
8. A rehab requires 620 square feet of flooring, and historical data shows 0.4 labor-hours per square foot for this crew. Using parametric estimating, how many labor-hours should be planned?
310 labor-hours
248 labor-hours
260 labor-hours
154 labor-hours
Answer: b. Parametric estimating multiplies a quantity by a validated unit rate: 620 sq ft x 0.4 labor-hours per sq ft = 248 labor-hours. This differs from analogous estimating, which would instead adjust the total hours from one similar past job rather than applying a per-unit rate.
9. A key carpenter is pre-assigned to a GCHS rehab. This means the person was:
Hired externally through acquisition
Negotiated from a functional manager once the execution phase had already started
Named in the project charter before formal resourcing began
Selected using multicriteria decision analysis
Answer: c. Pre-assignment means the person is already named, typically in the charter, before acquisition activities begin. External hiring, negotiation with functional managers, and weighted candidate selection are all separate acquisition paths.
10. Which technique adds resources to shorten an activity's duration and typically increases cost?
Fast tracking
Resource smoothing
Crashing
Resource leveling
Answer: c. Crashing adds resources such as an extra crew or overtime to compress duration, and it typically increases cost. Fast tracking compresses duration by overlapping sequential work instead, increasing risk and rework rather than necessarily cost, and neither is a resource optimization technique.
11. A delivery of ADA fixtures arrives three weeks late. Investigation shows the supplier had its own capacity shortfall, unrelated to anything GCHS did. What should the PM do?
Apply the same corrective action regardless of cause
Escalate directly to the sponsor before investigating
Immediately terminate the supplier contract
Treat the delay as a supplier capacity issue and respond accordingly, which differs from a delay caused by GCHS's own late purchase order
Answer: d. The PM investigates the cause of a physical resource shortfall before reacting, because a supplier-caused delay calls for a different response than a delay GCHS caused itself. Reacting identically to every cause, or escalating before understanding the situation, skips a step PMI expects.
12. A responsibility assignment matrix marks two people as Accountable for the same deliverable. What is the risk?
The RACI chart becomes a WBS
The deliverable automatically fails quality control until the matrix is corrected
None, shared accountability improves oversight
Nobody is truly accountable, since each task needs exactly one Accountable
Answer: d. Multiple Accountable parties on one row means, in practice, that no one is accountable: the single-A rule exists precisely to prevent this. Multiple Responsible parties are fine; Accountable is not meant to be shared.
13. Compared to a weak matrix organization, a project manager in a strong matrix organization:
Must always escalate staffing needs to the sponsor before asking functional managers
Cannot acquire team members without a formal RFP
Has no more authority than in a weak matrix
Has moderate to high authority and stronger influence over staffing
Answer: d. A strong matrix gives the PM moderate to high authority and moderate to high resource availability, a meaningful step up from a weak matrix where the PM mostly expedites or coordinates. Neither structure requires an RFP to staff internal team members.
14. At project closeout, which action is part of properly releasing resources?
Ignoring functional managers' staffing needs until the next project starts
Deleting the resource calendar without review
Retaining all subcontractors indefinitely in case of warranty issues
Returning equipment rentals, inventorying surplus material, and releasing team members with performance feedback
Answer: d. Formal release includes returning rentals, handling surplus material, and releasing team members back to their functional homes with feedback. Failing to release resources burns budget on unused rentals and damages relationships with functional managers waiting on their staff.
Glossary
Resource management plan
The subsidiary plan covering how resources are identified, acquired, controlled, and released, including roles, training, and recognition.
Resource breakdown structure (RBS)
A hierarchical list of resources by category and type, such as labor by trade, equipment, and materials.
RACI chart
A responsibility assignment matrix using Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed; exactly one Accountable per task.
Resource leveling
Adjusting start and finish dates so resource demand does not exceed supply; often extends the critical path.
Resource smoothing
Adjusting activities only within available float so the critical path and completion date do not change.
Pre-assignment
A team member named for the project, typically in the charter, before formal acquisition activities begin.
Team charter
Working agreements created by the team itself, establishing values, norms, and how the team will operate.
Matrix organization
An organizational structure, ranging from weak to strong, in which project and functional authority are shared.